tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3538502828554372917.post6777755632545972814..comments2024-03-28T18:59:57.979+00:00Comments on Poul Anderson Appreciation: Fiction And RealityKetlanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08588156788583883454noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3538502828554372917.post-73399565276060427962016-09-01T15:53:59.950+01:002016-09-01T15:53:59.950+01:00Hi, David!
I'm delighted to see your interest...Hi, David!<br /><br />I'm delighted to see your interesting comments!<br /><br />I'm esp. interested to learn you read more of the Carolingian legends than I have--such as the story of Huon of Bordeaux.<br /><br />And I certainly agree there was at least one, or several Romano-Briton war leaders or chiefs who fought the invading Anglo/Saxons to a temporary standstill from the mid to late fifth century AD. I agree that was the origin of the Arthurian legends.<br /><br />SeanSean M. Brookshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13973738112230622557noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3538502828554372917.post-60182400335991499262016-09-01T11:10:55.285+01:002016-09-01T11:10:55.285+01:00Paul:
Whether Alfric's king is Oberon depends ...Paul:<br />Whether Alfric's king is Oberon depends on the degree to which PA accepted the Carolingian legends as true for his story. Holger recalls Huon of Bordeaux as having "become a king or duke or something in Faerie...." Andre Norton's retelling of that legend, *Huon of the Horn*, ends with Oberon appointing Huon to be his successor when Oberon abdicates and goes off ... apparently to Avalon. Whoever rules Faerie when Holger arrives, it thus shouldn't be Oberon -- unless he's come back like a Faerie Arthur.<br /><br />By the way, I read *Huon of the Horn* not long BEFORE reading *Three Hearts and Three Lions* (40 years ago and more), so when Holger remembered Huon, I knew in some detail the legend to which he referred.<br /><br />Sean, however historical the name "Arthur" may or may not have been, SOMEBODY stopped the Saxon invasion of Britain for a while, maybe as much as 50 years. <br />"Clearly, the man or men upon whose exploits the epic figure of Arthur was built made sufficient impact in their own day for their memories long to outlive them.... It is a historical fact that in Britannia, alone among the western provinces of the Roman Empire, a native population halted the wave of Germanic invasion for a significant time." - *Arthur and the Anglo-Saxon Wars*, David Nicolle, PhD.David Birrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08973889429164886381noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3538502828554372917.post-74869894705127858142016-09-01T08:46:41.368+01:002016-09-01T08:46:41.368+01:00Kaor, Paul!
By and large, I prefer the Carolingia...Kaor, Paul!<br /><br />By and large, I prefer the Carolingian legends (as for example, in the SONG OF ROLAND) to the Arthurian mythos. Because, at the very least, Charlemagne was REAL, actually historical. And the short lived revival of the Roman Empire he founded left a deep mark in the memories and hopes of Europe.<br /><br />SeanSean M. Brookshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13973738112230622557noreply@blogger.com