I have read this story to its surprise ending and will let blog readers do the same. When subversives infiltrate Security, any plot twist becomes possible.
The secret project produces capacitite and call it ffuts. We did wonder whether the same name would be used. It is not.
Poul Anderson plausibly describes a scientific theory and a discovery that have not happened yet. My attempted summary might reveal a lack of scientific knowledge.
Superior dielectrics might lead both to a perfect electrical insulator and to fantastic energy storage. A small accumulator with minimal leakage would make possible generators handling average instead of peak load. Portable electric motors carrying their own energy supply would enable "...electric automobiles and possibly aircraft..." Power sources could be remote, like distant waterfalls, or diffuse, like sunlight, and could augment or even replace declining reserves.
A mineral combining barium, titanium and rare earths and displaying fantastic electrical properties was found on Venus. Its dielectric constant increases with applied voltage, contradicting theory. Such variability implies a flexible crystal structure even though the substance is brittle. Understanding of this process, produced by a geological freak, involves quantum mechanics, oscillation theory and the periodic functions of a complex variable.The team, which has formulated a tentative theory of the mechanism and begun to search for a way to duplicate this super-dielectricity in more useful materials, comprises:
Kaor, Paul!
ReplyDeleteHmmm, "deadly hand guns" reminds me of the "blasters" seen in the Technic stories.
But pistols as powerful as powerful as an artillery battery are more difficult to accept.
Merry Christmas! Sean
Sean: well, an assault rifle is, at the usual ranges, about as dangerous as a Vickers machine gun from WW1... and firearms are a 'mature' technology.
ReplyDeleteKaor, Mr. Stirling!
ReplyDeleteGranted, the power and lethality of small arms should not be underestimated, including older types of firearms.
Merry Christmas! Sean
WW1 happened when defensive firepower was at its maximum -- machine-guns were usually fairly heavy. They could be mobile, but couldn't fire while moving, which was a general problem, among many others.
ReplyDeleteAlso, WW1 happened before tactics -adjusted- to the increased firepower; in fact, all European armies were focused on offensive tactics precisely -because- they knew that defensive firepower had increased its deadliness. The French were worst, but all were guilty to a certain degree.
ReplyDeleteKaor, Mr. Stirling!
ReplyDeleteIIRC, WW I era machine guns needed three-or-four man-teams to be used effectively.
It wasn't till 1917-18 that both sides were finally figuring out ways to counteract that edge defensive fire power had.
The French were truly terrible insisting on the inappropriate use of offensive tactics, but the Turks might have been the runner ups. I read of how, during the Gallipoli campaign, ignoring the advice of their German and Austrian allies, they were nearly bled white by the British thru over aggressive tactics.
Happy New Year! Sean
Sean: well, for hundreds of years, overwhelmingly aggressive tactics -worked-. Then they didn't, but cultural commitments to them were strong.
ReplyDeleteKaor, Mr. Stirling!
ReplyDeleteToo true, it can be so hard for national/military leaders to adapt to how tactics needs to be appropriate.
Happy New Year! Sean