War Of The Wing-Men, IX.
How does the author's reasoning about social developments stack up?
"In many ways, the Drak'honia were closer to the human norm than the Lannachska." (p. 55)
Why?
"Their master-serf culture was a natural consequence of economics..." (ibid.)
So what were their economics?
"...given only neolithic tools, a raft big enough to support several families represented an enormous capital investment." (ibid.)
So why did the Drak'honai make that investment instead of staying with the migratory life-cycle of other Diomedeans? (The answer to this question probably is in the text. I am following through the reasoning again.)
Given life on big rafts:
"It was simply not possible for disgruntled individuals to strike out on their own; they were at the mercy of the State." (ibid.)
OK.
"In such cases, power always concentrated in the hands of aristocratic warriors and intellectual priesthoods; among the Drak'honai, those two classes had merged into one." (pp. 55-56)
In the opening sentence of Chapter I, a single individual bears five titles:
Kaor, Paul!
ReplyDeleteThe Drak'honai setup makes sense to me. If you want the advantages of the Fleet's equivalents of having an agricultural and urbanized society, the State will be necessary to keep both the peace internally and defense from external attack.
Migratory/nomadic cultures don't need something so "organized."
Happy New Year! Sean
This is analogous to what happened to humans after the invention of agriculture and then cities and the State. It enabled denser populations and more concentrated power, but actually meant more work and less freedom for most.
ReplyDeleteAnd we can now work towards regaining individual freedom while retaining the benefits of technology.
ReplyDeleteNo, because a complex society requires hierarchies of power. It slags down without those.
ReplyDeleteI think that we can fully democratize society and have public office-holders who really are the servants of their electorates.
ReplyDeleteKaor, Mr. Stirling!
ReplyDeleteExactly, complex societies simply can't function without those hierarchies of power. What needs to be done is to keep those hierarchies from becoming too oppressive, in whatever forms they take.
Happy New Year! Sean