In Virgin Planet, Bertram Davis refers sarcastically to Coordinator Yamagata Tetsuo as "'...the Cosmic All...,'" (CHAPTER II, p. 15) which tells us that this phrase is used in "...the philosophical pantheism of Cosmos..." (AUTHOR'S NOTE, p. 151) In Anderson's Technic History, Olaf Magnusson contemplates the All.
I think that the All is a valid concept. The relative is that which exists by virtue of its relationships to something/everything else. The Absolute, the opposite of the relative, is independent of external relationships and therefore can only be everything, the totality of all the relationships. The Absolute is internally differentiated and appears to itself as many finite subjects and objects distributed through space and time. We can contemplate It but not pray to It. It has been personified as a single personal being whereas in reality it incorporates all such beings.
Kaor, Paul!
ReplyDeleteOf course I disagree with your last paragraph. The TRUE Cosmic All is not a merely abstract, bloodless, theoretical concept, but a true Being existing from all eternity.
Ad astra! Sean
Sean,
ReplyDeleteBut I have not said that the All is abstract, bloodless, theoretical or a concept. It is clearly the concrete reality from which we abstract concepts.
Paul.
Kaor, Paul!
ReplyDeleteTrue, I should have specified that was how I understood the Cosmic "religion" and the Cosmic All. I don't think so vague a religion, which doesn't believe in any kind of god, will catch on with many people.
Ad astra! Sean
Sean,
ReplyDeleteNevertheless, some of us meditate without reference to a deity.
Paul.
Referring to the Co-ordinator as "the Cosmic All" would be roughly equivalent to "he's God in his own mind".
ReplyDelete