In my teens, I rated James Blish more than Robert Heinlein and Heinlein more than Poul Anderson - Larry Niven was not around yet - but I had not yet read enough Anderson and he wrote a lot more after that.
I hope to have demonstrated that Anderson's Technic History is an ultimate future history series, surpassing Heinlein's in:
number of installments;
length of time covered;
number of historical periods covered;
volume of space encompassed;
interesting characters;
continuing characters;
series within the series;
alien races;
extraterrestrial environments;
analyses of historical processes;
quality of writing.
Heinlein's Future History is, as a series, complete in four volumes because Volume V is a short appendix that does not advance the fictional history. Blish's major future historical work, Cities In Flight, a tetralogy, might be classed as a truncated future history because:
it holds up well as a future history series until somewhere in Volume III but, after that, the antiagathics are keeping a small group of characters alive indefinitely so the reader loses track of the centuries;
the universe is destroyed and new creations begin at the end of Volume IV.
The Technic History, many volumes longer, addresses an indefinite future.
Kaor, Paul!
ReplyDeleteYes, it was in the third of Blish's Flying Cities books that I lost interest in the story.
As far as the quality of his writing went, I would rate Heinlein's pre-STRANGER IN A STRANGE LAND stories as better than those of Bish's works I had read.
And I agree with your list of the ways in which Anderson's Technic stories surpassed Heinlein's Future History.
Ad astra! Sean