Wednesday, 20 September 2017

Solman

What do you identify yourself as? American? British? Something else? Personally, I do not call myself British. I just say that I was born and live in the North West of England and have a British passport although my parentage could equally have entitled me to an Irish one.

Now imagine that some human beings have been living elsewhere in the galaxy for a very long time and that, when you travel there, you are identified as - a Solman! (Or Solwoman.) That is what happens in Poul Anderson's The Peregrine.

Peregrine Thorkild Sean is responsible for bringing both an Alorian and a Cordy onto the Peregrine. Is it just coincidence that both the Cordy Trevelyan and the Peregrine are investigating a possible threat to humanity and that the Peregrine is the Nomad ship that Trevelyan deliberately gets himself shanghaied onto? I am not going to find the answer at this time of night.

My night time prayer or invocation, if anyone wants to share it, is:

"From delusion, lead us to truth;
"From darkness, lead us to light." (three times)

I adapted it from an Upanishad. In the morning, I say:

"We meditate on the lovely light of the god, Savitri; may it stimulate our thoughts."

8 comments:

  1. If you live in a country as a citizen and enjoy the privileges that go with that -- the right to hold office and own property and vote and so forth -- it's well to bear in mind that there are no legitimate rights without obligations. They're an inseparably paired duality.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kaor, Paul!

      And I agree with what Mr. Stirling said. I am a citizen of the US, and I hope I would feel the same way if I was a subject of Her Majesty. Or if, in Anderson's Technic History, a citizen of the Terran Empire.

      Sean

      Delete
    2. I was brought up with a legacy of conflict between England and Ireland. People expected me to "take sides" and I reacted against this, regarding the circumstances of my birth as accidental. A lot of people identify Britain with oppression. Meanwhile, the rights that we have in either country have to be defended and extended. Someone pointed out to me that I have had, e.g., a better education than many people elsewhere in the world. Yes. He added that I should defend this. Defend good education? Yes. Defend a continued disparity between educational systems? No.

      Delete
    3. Kaor, Paul!

      Of course it's an accident, the location and circumstances of one's birth--but I still argue some countries are better than others. And I believe the UK and US, for all their faults and self inflicted wounds, to be better than practically all other non-Western nations. And thus deserving of loyalty.

      Not sure what you mean by "disparity between educational systems." You already know of the contempt I have for many gov't managed public schools in the US. I am inclined to favor systems replacing failed ideas and systems.

      Sean

      Delete
    4. Sean,
      I thought that the guy I was talking to might have meant, "There is a good educational system here and much poorer systems elsewhere. Let's keep it that way!"
      Paul.

      Delete
    5. Kaor, Paul!

      And I would agree with that gentleman, esp. if he meant the UK has different kinds of schools for different kinds of people.

      Sean

      Delete
    6. Sean,
      He might have meant, "Let us maintain a global status quo in which we are permanently better educated than anyone else."
      Paul.

      Delete
    7. Kaor, Paul!

      And I would disagree with that "beggar thy neighbor" attitude if that was what he meant!

      Sean

      Delete