tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3538502828554372917.post4323609325665080204..comments2024-03-28T23:42:09.625+00:00Comments on Poul Anderson Appreciation: PracticsKetlanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08588156788583883454noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3538502828554372917.post-85222332176809413912016-07-24T23:32:00.784+01:002016-07-24T23:32:00.784+01:00Kaor, Paul!
I agree with what you said about &quo...Kaor, Paul!<br /><br />I agree with what you said about "the restoration of a society in which it is possible to study something other than practical skills." Our civilization used to have that when universities and colleges focused on the Classics and humanities as much as they did on practical things like engineering.<br /><br />And any attempt to study a Bronze Age culture before it inevitably changed or went under due to contact with Nantucket would need to be funded by a society wealthy enough to pay abstract studies.<br /><br />Regretfully, I cannot agree with your last paragraph. Because I believe it's unrealistic about human beings. For one thing, I do not believe it will ever be the case any human society will have all its people combining the best qualities of aristocrats and laborers alike. Unfortunately, we will always have, at all levels, human beings who will be wise or foolish, generous or selfish, stupid or intelligent, cruel or merciful, etc. Absent the Second Coming, all human societies will be a frustrating mix of the good and bad. Which helps to explain both why we need the state and the equal need to restrain and limit the government.<br /><br />SeanSean M. Brookshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13973738112230622557noreply@blogger.com