tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3538502828554372917.post1767432377531656394..comments2024-03-28T18:59:57.979+00:00Comments on Poul Anderson Appreciation: Comparative ChronologiesKetlanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08588156788583883454noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3538502828554372917.post-23676555725448544472016-02-25T15:27:00.531+00:002016-02-25T15:27:00.531+00:00Kaor, Paul!
Including the works co-written by Niv...Kaor, Paul!<br /><br />Including the works co-written by Niven and Pournelle? I agree, the authors knew how to work together to make sure the POV we see in their joint books remained consistent. But I'm sure it must have taken a lot of debate!<br /><br />SeanSean M. Brookshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13973738112230622557noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3538502828554372917.post-64292580105820083462016-02-25T08:43:53.925+00:002016-02-25T08:43:53.925+00:00Sean,
Both of these authors know how to control po...Sean,<br />Both of these authors know how to control pov in their own works.<br />Paul.Paul Shackleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04180596532266581425noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3538502828554372917.post-69475850425981854042016-02-25T08:29:26.783+00:002016-02-25T08:29:26.783+00:00Kaor, Paul!
Perhaps the "disjointedness"...Kaor, Paul!<br /><br />Perhaps the "disjointedness" you noticed in THE MOTE IN GOD'S EYE came from the book being by two authors, rather than one. A collaborative work, even if as successful as MOTE, might still sometimes have a few rough spots.<br /><br />SeanSean M. Brookshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13973738112230622557noreply@blogger.com